Which statement correctly describes the distinction between Robbery 1 and Robbery 2 in NY?

Which statement correctly describes the distinction between Robbery 1 and Robbery 2 in NY?

• A. Robbery 2 requires an additional factor beyond forcible stealing
• B. Robbery 1 includes an aggravating factor such as serious injury or firearm
• C. Robbery 1 does not require any aggravating factor
• D. Robbery 3 requires no additional factors

Answer: (B)

In New York, how severe a robbery is depends on whether aggravating elements accompany the forcible taking. Robbery in the first degree is charged when, during the robbery, the offender either causes serious physical injury to someone or uses or displays a deadly weapon (such as a firearm). Those aggravating factors elevate the offense to the highest degree. Without those elements, the same act of forcible stealing falls into the lower degree. So the statement that Robbery 1 includes an aggravating factor like serious injury or firearm correctly captures the distinction from Robbery 2. The other options misstate how Robbery 1 and Robbery 2 are differentiated.

In New York, how severe a robbery is depends on whether aggravating elements accompany the forcible taking. Robbery in the first degree is charged when, during the robbery, the offender either causes serious physical injury to someone or uses or displays a deadly weapon (such as a firearm). Those aggravating factors elevate the offense to the highest degree. Without those elements, the same act of forcible stealing falls into the lower degree. So the statement that Robbery 1 includes an aggravating factor like serious injury or firearm correctly captures the distinction from Robbery 2. The other options misstate how Robbery 1 and Robbery 2 are differentiated.